We Are Actively Engaged In and Taking Exactech Knee and Hip Cases - CONTACT US TODAY
Skip to Content
Available 24/7 316-688-1166
Top
INJURED IN AN ACCIDENT? Put A Skilled Team of Attorneys on Your Side

Defective 3M Military Combat Earplug Lawsuits in Kansas

Let Our Lawyer Help You Recover Your Entitled Compensation

Did you serve the U.S. military and had been deployed in an active war zone between 2003 and 2015? Were you issued dual-sided 3M Combat Arms Earplugs™ (CAEv2)? If you answered “yes” to both questions and are now experiencing hearing loss or tinnitus, you may be entitled to financial compensation.

3M, a Minnesota-based company, agreed to pay millions of dollars to the federal government for knowingly supplying the U.S. military with defective earplugs. These earplugs were issued to millions of service men and women, many of whom have been suffering hearing problems ever since.

At Hutton & Hutton Law Firm, LLC, we are committed to helping you obtain the compensation and justice you deserve. With half a century of legal experience and more than $400 million recovered for our clients, our Wichita 3m earplug injury attorneys have held some of the largest companies liable for their negligent actions. We’re ready to put that experience to work on your behalf.

How Were the 3M Earplugs Defective?

The now-discontinued CAEv2 earplugs had a yellow end and a black/olive end. One side was used as traditional earplugs and the other side provided better noise protection from gunfire and explosions, while still allowing quieter noises (such as speech) to filter through.

However, the 3M earplugs were too short to be inserted properly into a soldier’s ears, causing them to eventually loosen upon use. As a result, many soldiers were exposed to damaging sound levels since the earplugs failed to reduce loud noises.

These earplugs were originally manufactured by Aero Technologies, Inc., which knew about the flawed design in 2000, according to court documents. 3M acquired Aero Technologies, Inc. in 2008 and was also aware the earplugs were too short to be completely inserted into a user’s ear.

 

Our Winning Strategy

  • We Charge You Nothing Until You Win
  • We Represent Clients with Integrity & Zeal
  • We Have Obtained Over $400 Million for Clients
  • We Are Recognized As Super Lawyers®

Contact Us Today

A member of our team will be in touch shortly to confirm your contact details or address questions you may have.

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy
  • 34,000,000.00 Personal Injury

    Mason v. Texaco, 948 F.2d 1546 (10th Cir. 1991). Otis Mason died of leukemia caused by exposure to benzene, an industrial solvent and gasoline component, for which the jury awarded $34 million.

  • 23,600,000.00 Personal Injury

    Darcy Aves was severely injured during birth, resulting in severe mental and physical retardation, blindness and seizures from Cerebral Palsy. Darcy’s twin sister, Danna, was born healthy. The jury awarded $23.6 million, the largest jury verdict in Kansas and one of the largest personal injury verdicts in the nation.

  • 15,000,000.00 Personal Injury

    Graham v. Wyeth Labs, 666 F.Supp. 1483 (D. Kan. 1987). Michelle Graham had a severe neurological reaction to Wyeth Labs’ DPT vaccine and suffered severe brain damage. The jury awarded $15 million. Wyeth thereafter purified the vaccine.

  • 11,200,000.00 Personal Injury

    O’Gilvie v. International Playtex, 821 F.2d 1438 (10th Cir. 1987). O’Gilvie died from Toxic Shock Syndrome after using Playtex super-absorbent tampons. The jury’s $11.2 million verdict led to the removal from the market of Playtex’s super-absorbent tampons and addition of warnings to packaging.

  • Personal Injury